I don't see why it would be a problem. Camera's don't allow you to take tanzaku aspect ratioed photographs anyway so there has to be some form of cropping whether it be in the darkroom or PS.Rather than shooting a vertical panorama my approach to creating an image for this thread was to use a Tanzaku template I created in PS. I used a clipping mask to add my image to the template. I could then use the transform tool use the section of my image that seemed to work. Is this something you would frown upon?
My latest effort - following the still life style of Helen’s.
View attachment 19054
I actually produced it on a light table and intended the image to be of the whole flower. Turned out that it was too short to fill the frame.
So I used a different approach: cropping the side to allow only the top part of the stem, but added a few petals at the bottom to give a connection between the bottom of the image and the top.
Lot of faffing about adding a shadow (well, that was the idea anyway) to make it look as if they were on the ground, based on this video:
There probably isn't one, Chris. Just the way I approached it.But I’m not clear what the advantage is over, say, taking a picture in a ‘normal’ format and then cropping that.
Chris
…… not sure about the radius border, although it is growing on me![]()
Does this count? Taken with a monochrome camera.Thinking about it …. This could be along the lines of Helen’s still life flower picture eg hi key.
Thanks for the comment. I agree.Seems to fit the format well....I like it. Maybe a little tight...top right?
For my taste, it’s too ‘solid’ - for this sort of picture I (currentlyDoes this count? Taken with a monochrome camera.
Thanks Chris...I hope I can remember that while taking the next shot...but, is this any better you think?For my taste, it’s too ‘solid’ - for this sort of picture I (currently) see delicacy as important for such images.